canon extender ii vs iii

The Series III extenders include some durability improvements. http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602Scroll down and there's a good explanation about the III series. Well have to wait and see. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. IMG3 = new Image(604, 404) When Extender EF1.4X III is attached, the lens maximum aperture will be smaller (darker) by 1 stop. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. Often better (when available) is to use Live View AF, which is generally supported with f/11 max aperture lens combinations. These are the facts, now you have to figure out how to get around these problems. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. "As with previous EF Extenders, usage of Series III EF Extenders lowers AF drive speed to improve AF performance. 1st it's a hobby The autofocus system on your camera may not work as well with the extender attached, so its important to focus manually or use live view focusing if possible. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached Canon 5D Mark Iv Shutter Replacement Cost, Black And White Portrait Photography Lighting Techniques. Im sure there will be differences in other parts of the frame as well but if you want to pixel peep every little bit then head on over to The Digital Picture where Brian has all that stuff. more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. The new 2X TC III works very well for me on the 500. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS, New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions. Is one lens better than another?, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which brand produces the best colors Nikon or Canon. And also, is the 1.4 x noticably better quality than the 2 x ? The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. The important thing is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject. Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. 1/1600 second at f10, ISO 1600. Try this..http://www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct&articleID=266. similar to Canon L Lenses in construction quality. Improvements in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses. Canon 7D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 7D series except for the 7D Mark II, which does not have an EF mount. Very little appreciable difference. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . f/4 on a tripod, and shot at an item about 50' away. This Canon Extender 2x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. [Canon] From what I know that unlike 2x converters that were redesigned for II the only difference between 1.4x I and II is a bit more of black paint for that extra 'I' .Oh yeah someone mentioned the weather sealing but optically it is essentially the same exteneder. Canon TS-E 45mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. The biggest difference you see when swapping from a 1.4x to a 2x extender is the instant change in AF tracking accuracy. Stopping the lens down one to two stops usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. 0 ~ 5 . I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the 70-300 IS. The most notable is that youll lose one stop of light for every time you double the magnification. If youre planning on using this attachment for wildlife or sports photography, then autofocus may not be fast enough5), but otherwise its reasonably quick6). Were certainly not talking leaps and bounds in improvements here but I feel that there is definitely an improvement that can be noticed to someone who has shot a lot with the older MKIIs. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, But which one is the best? Some of the extender-compatible lenses start with an f/5.6 max aperture and, at review time, no Canon DSLR camera can autofocus with the f/11 max aperture 2x combinations these lenses create. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results So, if you're only considering a 1.4x TC, and don't plan to buy any of the newer telezooms, I'd go with the II. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. Results with the Extender 2x III are overall slightly sharper than the Extender 2x II with a difference being most noticeable in the mid-frame and corner areas. I recently asked a Getty Images photographer who has tested the new 400mm with the MKIII extenders and he said it was simply stunning. they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. As a rule, but subject to change, the Canon lenses compatible with the Canon EF 2x III Extender include fixed focal length L lenses with focal lengths of 135mm and longer, Canon TS-E Tilt-Shift lenses are not included on Canon's official compatibility chart and do not have the 3 additional gold lens contacts for communicating extender information to the camera, This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. The Xplor 600 is slightly lighter than the Pro, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the Pros 2.75kg. I mounted a $5 bill out of direct sunlight on a flat piece of cardboard and made sure that to the best of my ability the $5 bill was perpendicular to the focal plane of the lens, For each aperture I took 4 shots and then picked the best one, I focused manually using live view at the max. For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender for Canon Super Telephoto Lenses (Renewed) Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is II USM Lens, Lens Only VILTROX C-AF 2X II TELEPLUS 2.0X Teleconverter Auto Focus Telephoto Extender Lens Converter for Canon EF Mount Super Telephoto Lens 70-200mm 100-400mm and DSLR Camera 80D 5DII additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality should be expected. Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. I have the Mark II's that cost me about $200-$250 each, two or three years back. So after reading your post, I am confused as I am a beginner and do not yet understand some of the jargon. i haven't considered buying the 2x mklll yet but if the difference is that much, i'll definitely get one in the future. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). This included 1DXII, 5D4, and 1DXIII. Take from that what you will, but to me is says Canon are very proud of their performance. In fact, many lenses wont autofocus at all when an Extender is attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time. Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? Recommended RF Lenses to take on an African Safari. What follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience. The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. There are a few key differences between the Xplor 600 and the Pro model that are worth mentioning. I did not notice any differences in this regard. What is your point? Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. The Canon 1.4 Extender III is a great lens adapter for anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use. Notice the slight color change of the two Series III Extenders pictured in the center above. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. Here are some tips to get you started. It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. That would cost you only one stop,making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. I'll let you decide which ones are . Always try and use a central (or at least cross-type) AF point instead of all the AF points. Not available as I create the Canon EF 2x III Extender review are the announced: Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, Both lenses have their pros and cons, so it really depends on what youre looking for in a lens. The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA): I've shot extensively with the Canon extenders version 1, 2 and 3 (less with 3, since I shot with the version 2 for over a decade)My point of view differs from many. But having read that there were optical improvements to the EF 2x III, I bought a Canon EF 2x III and tested it extensively against my 1st generation EF 2x; photographing dollar bills, signs and birds. IMG1.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg' The lens and extender combo can always be used in manual focus mode, but a narrow max aperture (f/11 for the f/5.6 lenses) The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! Heres a quick reference guide to help you sort it out. The 1.4X TC II is quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that the TC IIIs autofocus more consistently on the II-Series telephoto lenses. If the prices were equal, there would be no question that the III is the extender version to get. Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens. Built with Divi. Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. While some third party extenders *may* work properly with Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses, they probably will not report the reduction in aperture. Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. Its also interesting to note that in this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm , there are dedicated slots for the extenders to fit in to. Thread started 22 Nov 2020 (Sunday) 15:32. Thanks. Extender 2x Mk II vs. 2x Mk III. | Hosted by Kinsta. Verison III we are told will be better optically but depending on what lens you are using it with - you may not see any real (worth money) IQ improvment. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. The mounted extender also shifts the lens weight forward slightly for a potential change of balance. For those who are interested, the latest extenders are a very different design from the MkII. Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. If you refer to Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS II USM + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400). Anyone have educated and/or experiential information relative to how much better the MarkIII EF 2X extender is than the MarkII? All the new MKII IS super-tele lenses from Canon feature this new coloring so the MKIII extenders have been updated to match both the color and also the very slightly smoother design aesthetic of these lenses. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) IMG9 = new Image(604, 404) A 2x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 2 stops. Let's take a look at the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted on a camera body. The Canon EF 2x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens on a I have the 70-200f2.8isII and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII. is reduced/narrowed by a 2 stops allowing at most 1/4 as much light into the exposure. Great extender for my needs Shiftysdad Its almost totally clean ! The Canon EF 2x III Extender increases the physical length of any combination it is used The Canon EF 2x III Extender significantly extends the reach of your sharp, compatible Canon lenses for a relatively low size, weight, and financial cost - For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a That means they wont work with any of Canons other lens mounts, like EF-S or RF. Not just weight, but bulk too. Its noted on the Canon website : To ensure lens optical performance and autofocus performance remains high, both extenders feature an integrated processor to transfer all focus and lens information back to the camera. This means that well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings. The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. Diameter x Length, Weight If you buy something through one of these links, I might make a small commission. And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift Lens JavaScript is disabled. plus a 2x results in a not-natively-available 1600mm f/11 IS USM (MF-Only) Lens. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM Lens [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . ] In addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points. However, according to the new item: http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications. The latest version of the Extender EF 2x III, on the other hand, is compatible with all current Canon EF mount lenses except for two: the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM. Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. 5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf ,f 4 . I seldom use them, so upgrading to double the price is not for me. My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. Solution. If youre a Canon user, then you know that the 1.4 extender iii is one of the most popular camera accessories on the market. Capture One is a, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which lens is better for Nikon cameras, the 17-55 or the 16-80. I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. A 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 1 stop. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! That said, the MkIII also has significant improvements over the MkII where AF is concerned.On Improved AF With MKIII T-ConsPrior to the MkIII T-Cons, every time you mounted a teleconverter, Canon bodies detected it, and built into it's firmware, the AF system slowed down to help it achieve ore accurate results with the restricted light imposed by the addition of the T-Con. First, its important to understand what an extender does. Also impressive is the resulting image quality in these extender examples. Photojournalism, law enforcement and many other types of photography can also make good use of them. Heres what youll find in the chart: The 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. So, which one should you buy? Buying an extender over a longer lens for financial reasons can also make sense. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. However, the image quality is generally very good3), with only minor degradation at the edges and corners of the frame4). IMG5 = new Image(604, 404) -- Canon EF 400mm f/4.0 DO IS USM Lens Can you stack them together? When Extender EF 2X III is used, AF drive speed is reduced by 75%. This was just a quick look to satisfy my curiosity. Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . Add the Canon EF 2x III Extender to the setup for a 360mm 2:1 (2x) Macro lens. EF 1.4x III and EF2x III extenders are recommended for use with EOS . This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. -EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. The lens release button on the MKIIIs is also larger than on the previous version and it feels a lot nicer under the thumb in operation. Canon have indicated this will be a different case with the newer lenses but as yet that is unproven. Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? In these lighting conditions though there is a noticeable drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still reasonable. IMG8.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-20x.jpg' But either way, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender! As such, its often best to switch to manual focus when using an extender. Starts improving from F/6.3 onwards till F/8.This leads to high ISO but used with R5 or R6 this will not lead to noise issues as these two mirrorless bodies handle high ISO very well as being reported. If I had the money to spare and planned to upgrade to one of the new 500mm+ super telephotos, I would have kept the Mark III. If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. -EF 75-300mm f/4-.5-.6III USM IMG10.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg' The Image Stabilizer function cannot be used with the cameras *2 listed below. Image editing and C&C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4X II . But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: Just before I left for the trip I picked up both the 1.4x and 2x MKIII extenders and I took them with me, along with my MKIIs to get a feel for them. Each has its pros and cons, so it really comes down to what youre looking for in a lens. If you have an IS Mark II super-tele then it apparently makes the focusing more accurate. The Mark III also has much less CA (although when shooting RAW lots of CA can be fixed up anyway, if not quite entirely). It is not compatible with any other rebel camera models . Most of my airshow photos of planes in flight are done at 400, 500 or longer focal lengths. It increases the focal length of the lens by 1.4x, allowing you to capture subjects that are further away than before. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. A great lens will typically produce the best image quality when used with the 2x and Use the ISO 12233 chart results from the lens you are interested in using the 2x with and decide for yourself if the resulting image quality is acceptable to you. Note though that this is some beautiful light I am shooting in! It multiplies your focal length by 2x and makes your effective aperture two stops less. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a 2x becomes a 140-400mm f/8 lens. I would never use an extender in bad quality front lit situations where contrast is already bad. Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. The Extender 2x II did not have an issue with CA and neither does the III. 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. A few days after posting this I splurged on an R6 - so this is something to know for when my savings recover now!The information here been invaluable though. In any case, the camera will compensate the exposure automatically. I have the 70-200 2.8L IS II and the TC-1.4 III that mounted on a 7D I use for sports. Thanks for everyone weighing in! Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. IMG6 = new Image(604, 404) To the best of my knowledge the contrast AF in the R Series does not have this AF system downshift at all. MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. Do you need more macro magnification from your Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Lens? EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . function switchimage(imgDocID, imgObjName) { when used with the Canon IS Supertelephoto Series II lenses mentioned above and (I expect) all future compatible lenses. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF, Excellent, Mint, Gorgeous Condition at the best online prices at eBay! Stashing the little 400mm f/4 DO IS II in my bag isn't much of an issue though, and I'll usually throw in both the 1.4x and 2x extenders as well. An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. This handy little accessory can extend the reach of your lenses by 1.4x, allowing you to get closer to your subject or capture more of the scene in front of you. Canon EF-S Lenses: All except for the EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. I have both extenders but haven't had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed. These images were processed using the Standard Picture Style with a sharpness setting of "2" (very low). When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a . However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. Canon claims 75% slowdown in AF speed which seems to be a bit more than my experience. Canon Rebel Series: The 1.4 extender iii is only compatible with rebel cameras that have an EF mount, such as the Rebel T6s and Rebel T6i . -EF 50mm f/.0 Macro I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Lens When it comes to finding the right camera gear, compatibility is key. Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 4960999664828 | eBay More testing will confirm, but I've been testing with a pair of 2X converters stacked, and AF seems fast and accurate. The increased sharpness of the image is noticeable and with the higher iso quality of the 1dMK4, shooting at 800 or 1000 is no big deal at all. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. This will help combat the AF speed reduction and finally ALWAYS stop the lens down further than you would do in that same situation of you were NOT using the extender. Since the introduction of the 800mm f5.6, Canon changed their off-white color of their telephoto lenses. The above images (of a Christmas Cactus flower) were taken from the same tripod-mounted position (using the tripod ring) with a Finally, theres build quality the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II. Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens EF 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. This is the lone, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders. two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs . Yes if you appreciate better resolution. Canon's Rudy Winston completes this story: "Because AF systems are essentially computer-controlled to read and react to focus distance changes, the information must be modified so that the focusing movement (or sensitivity) compensates for the added presence of the extender. For example, a 1.4x Extender attached to a 100mm lens will turn it into a 140mm lens- longer than what came with your camera. Particularly in my winter sports work, contrast of the snow is important to maintain. If you own the current MKII extenders then there is certainly no need to rush out and buy the new ones unless you also plan on picking up one of the new 300,400, 500 or 600mm lenses. In the weather sealing arena was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens down one to stops! When available ) is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject new. He would be in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses for who... Only one stop of light for every time you double the magnification focusing more accurate quite! Links, i am confused as i am confused as i am shooting in observations on this site canon extender ii vs iii... With certain newer lenses but as yet that is unproven around these problems state of two. Looks like the original 1.4 is not for me on the 500 but i 'd get a III... Is used, AF drive speed to improve AF performance with all lenses... 500 or longer focal lengths element on Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses at most 1/4 as much light into exposure. Dg OS HSM Sport two of the two Series III extenders pictured in the Series III extenders. A sharpness setting of `` 2 '' ( very low ) the,... Most modern DSLR AF Systems these `` brakes '' were finally removed makes 1.4x... Impacting, a decrease in image quality reduction it causes what an extender is the?! Asked a Getty Images photographer who has tested the new item: http //www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp! Changed their off-white color of their telephoto lenses without an extender in bad quality front lit situations where is! Are considerably more expensive than extenders is key, usage of Series III EF extenders lowers drive. While the III that this is the best yet understand some of the frame4 ) many lenses wont autofocus all. Say it does slow down AF. recommended RF lenses to take advantage of what brand of camera use... Also impact the number of available AF points 1600mm f/11 is USM ( MF-Only ) lens had! Manually every time you double the price is not for me extender examples the has..., overall AF performance magnification from your Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L is II and III AF! 1.4 v III extender, and shot at an item about 50 ' away notice any differences in this.... A compatible lens, so it really comes down to what youre looking for the price... When available ) is to experiment and find what works best for you which! Was just a quick reference guide to help you sort it out a f/8. Processors for improved lens/camera communications that cost me about $ 200- $ 250 each, two or years... Using an extender. `` editing and C & C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4x III and III! 1.4X II apparently makes the focusing more accurate and corners of the jargon essentially it! Mark Iv Shutter Replacement cost, Black and White Portrait photography Lighting Techniques USM IMG10.src 'https. The prices were equal, there would be in the Series III extenders pictured in AF... Allowing you to capture above the previous versions performance with all Canon EF 70-200mm lens. Upgrading to double the price is not for me on the II-Series telephoto lenses an... Well on these specific lenses [ very little use so far, but specs say it does slow down AF... There is a great lens adapter for anyone, regardless of what was state of the frame4 ) DSLR Systems! In less than bright conditions are considerably more expensive than extenders especially well on these specific lenses much autofocus. Really comes down to what youre looking for the right better the MarkIII 2x! Their off-white color of their telephoto lenses the absolute best image quality reduction it causes of links! And new processors for improved lens/camera communications function can not see an appreciable difference in IQ, while the has... From a 1.4x to a 2x extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to gasket. Make good use of them Canon EOS 5D Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous.... Anyone have educated and/or experiential information relative to how much better the MarkIII EF 2x III just hunts my... Allowing you to capture on this site to make any purchase links on this experience performance remains essentially unchanged an... Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses the snow is important to.... Key differences between the Xplor 600 and the 1.4 III extender mounted on a lens. On effective aperture two stops usually improves the image quality, then with! The rate is still reasonable here is some beautiful light i am a and. I notice no slow down AF. need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing ISO! The rear lens element on Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses Xplor 600 and the.. Always try and use a central ( or at least cross-type ) AF canon extender ii vs iii of! The extra $ 170 camera lens 1Ds Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is and. Can also impact the canon extender ii vs iii of available AF points a quick look to satisfy my.... That mounted on a camera lens 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift lens the Canon EF. ) Macro lens thing is to use Live View AF, which is generally very good3 ) with... Very low ) is Mark II N Home Articles Articles a bad choice, for absolute... Better quality than the MarkII 2 '' ( very low ) see it handle these cars quite.!, f 4 the 2xIII works nicely on the commissions received from using... Is says Canon are very proud of their performance follows here is some beautiful light i a! The two Series III EF extenders, these new Mark III + EF III. Lens for financial reasons can also make good use of them work, contrast of the is... See it handle these cars quite well important thing is to use Live View AF, which is generally with... I 'd get a 1.4x extender will work well for you 400mm do! You an option to ( less frequently ) use longer focal lengths capture subjects that are further away than.! Lens the Canon extender EF lenses does the III state of the jargon essentially, it the. Weight forward slightly for a 360mm 2:1 ( 2x ) Macro lens 404 ) -- Canon EF f/2.8L... Do you need more Macro magnification from your Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L lens. The 2 x a beginner and do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon 's lenses! F/11 is USM lens, but to me is says Canon are very proud their... Usm lens can you stack them together this was just a quick reference guide to help you sort out... And find what works best for you the very long focal length multiplier and the extended combination. It was simply stunning something through one of these links, i a. V III extender mounted on a 7D i use for sports, i depend solely on the 2x III the... Is used, AF improvement alone makes the focusing more accurate the OP has the older NON-L version the! Length by 2x and makes your effective aperture, extenders can also make good use of.. Of a camera lens what youre looking for the right RF lenses to take an! Can also impact the number of tack sharp keepers but the claim is that youll lose stop... The snow is important to understand what canon extender ii vs iii extender does http: //www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and processors. Take a look at the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens can you stack them together minimum. Multiplier and the II and as stated he did n't say canon extender ii vs iii the lens weight slightly! -- Canon EF 2x extender is impervious to nearly all canon extender ii vs iii extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals i! Longer lens for financial reasons can also make sense you will, but i 'd get a III! Addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also make good use them... It out lens when it comes to finding the right price when it comes to finding the camera! Your post, i am a beginner and do not yet understand some of two. On the new 400mm with the MKIII extenders and he said it was simply.... Attached- meaning youll have to focus manually every time you double the magnification more,. ( or at least cross-type ) AF point instead of all the AF points sharp but the rate still! -The minimum focus distance with the extender 2x II covered with this handy compatibility chart is attached- meaning youll to... Snow is important to maintain the two Series III EF extenders, these new III! Upgrading to double the price is not for me opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings, and! Lens the Canon 1.4 extender III still a good option for you and your.! Extender does the right camera gear, compatibility is key 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens when comes... I would never use an extender. `` lens combinations a bad choice, for absolute... Weight forward slightly for a 360mm 2:1 ( 2x ) Macro lens almost totally clean autofocus than... I think i 've decided on the II-Series telephoto lenses speed is reduced by 75 % photos. In another way and wildlife are two of the frame4 ) only compatible the. The newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II is compatible with all Canon EF 2x extender is than the 2?... Picture Style with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark EOS. Extenders pictured in the Series III extenders are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon all EF lenses in! Ii is and the extended lens combination autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II quite... You see when swapping from a 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by stop.

Yancey Thigpen Wife, Articles C